Workflow discovery for IT delivery teams
WorkflowHarvest by Harvest Systems

HARVEST CHAOS.BUILD SYSTEMS.

WorkflowHarvest turns messy process notes, SOPs, spreadsheets, meeting notes, and stakeholder input into build-ready workflow briefs, Scrum user stories, acceptance criteria, QA notes, and implementation roadmaps.

View Sample Output
1. Intake 2. Analysis 3. Requirements 4. Scrum Stories 5. Export
WorkflowHarvest turns messy intake into gaps, automation recommendations, and export packs Structured intake Scrum stories Clean exports

Built for the handoff between business process and IT development.

The product is not just a generic chatbot. It gives consultants, BAs, Product Owners, Scrum Masters, developers, and QA teams a repeatable path from unclear intake to backlog-ready delivery artifacts.

1

Capture intake

Paste notes or upload PDFs, DOCX files, CSVs, spreadsheets, SOPs, or process descriptions.

2

Identify the workflow

Surface actors, handoffs, manual steps, approvals, exceptions, risks, dependencies, and missing information.

3

Generate build artifacts

Create requirements, Scrum user stories, acceptance criteria, QA notes, and implementation guidance.

4

Export for delivery

Download client-ready Word documents, PDF-ready print views, Jira-ready CSVs, and QA/UAT documentation.

Sample output: from process mess to Scrum-ready work.

Click through the full feature set a buyer would care about: intake, gap analysis, automation scoring, requirements, Scrum stories, acceptance criteria, QA/UAT notes, risks, missing questions, roadmap, and clean exports.

Messy intake example
Email requests, Excel tracking, Teams approvals, delayed ticket creation, unclear workflow rules, and missing developer-ready details.
Structured Intake

WorkflowHarvest captures the context IT teams need before refinement.

The user can provide project name, client, industry, process description, pain points, systems/tools, desired outcome, constraints, data sensitivity, and supporting files.

  • Upload PDFs, DOCX files, spreadsheets, CSVs, TXT files, or paste raw notes.
  • Autofill likely fields from uploaded documents where possible.
  • Preserve the original messy input for traceability and human review.
Gap

Missing validation rules

Required documents, invalid files, duplicate submissions, and exception paths are not defined well enough for build.

Gap

Unclear ownership

Approver, reviewer, ticket owner, and escalation responsibilities need to be clarified before sprint commitment.

Gap

Weak visibility

Leadership and delivery teams lack a single status view for pending, blocked, approved, rejected, and completed requests.

High PriorityQuick WinLow Complexity

Automate document validation before review

Current pain point: Staff manually inspect attachments and chase missing information by email.

Recommended automation: Validate required documents at submission, block incomplete records, and route complete submissions to the correct reviewer.

Business valueHigh
Manual effort reductionHigh
ComplexityMedium
RiskMedium
Data sensitivityReview needed
PriorityPhase 1 candidate
FR-001

Document validation

The system shall validate required onboarding documents before allowing a request to enter the review workflow.

Traceability: Inferred from intake

FR-002

Reviewer routing

The system shall assign complete onboarding requests to the correct reviewer based on defined routing rules.

Traceability: Recommended by WorkflowHarvest

NFR-001

Status visibility

The system shall display request status, owner, submitted date, blocking reason, and next action for delivery visibility.

Traceability: Needs confirmation

Scrum User StorySource: Inferred from intake

US-001 — Validate onboarding documents before routing

Epic: Client Onboarding Workflow Modernization

Story: As a request submitter, I want the system to validate required onboarding documents before submission, so that incomplete requests do not enter the review workflow.

Developer note: Confirm required document rules, status values, routing logic, role access, audit history, and error message behavior before sprint commitment.

QA note: Test happy path, missing-document path, invalid file type, duplicate upload, reviewer assignment, and status visibility.

Given / When / Then

Acceptance Criteria for US-001

  • Given required onboarding documents are missing, when the submitter attempts to submit the request, then the system prevents submission and identifies the missing items.
  • Given all required documents are attached, when the submitter submits the request, then the system creates a workflow record with submitted status and timestamp.
  • Given a completed request has been submitted, when routing rules are evaluated, then the system assigns the request to the correct reviewer.
  • Given the request is blocked, when a user views the dashboard, then the blocking reason and next action are visible.

Definition of Ready: Required document rules, routing matrix, user roles, status values, and sample test data are confirmed.

Definition of Done: Criteria pass in functional testing, UAT notes are captured, and stakeholder review is completed.

Functional tests

Submit complete request, route to reviewer, update status, and display dashboard record.

Negative tests

Missing documents, invalid file type, duplicate submission, unauthorized reviewer access.

Edge cases

Approver unavailable, late document replacement, duplicate clients, and conflicting routing rules.

UAT notes

Confirm submitter clarity, reviewer workflow, status visibility, and leadership reporting needs.

Medium Risk

Unconfirmed routing rules

Impact: Tickets could route to the wrong reviewer. Mitigation: Confirm routing matrix before build.

Medium Risk

Sensitive client data

Impact: Upload and retention controls may be required. Mitigation: Define data handling rules and access controls.

Assumption

Teams remains approval source

WorkflowHarvest flags assumptions so teams can validate them before implementation planning.

Missing Information Detection

Questions to ask before build

  • Which documents are required for each onboarding request type?
  • Who approves each request, and what rules determine the reviewer?
  • What statuses are required from submission through completion?
  • What data is sensitive, and who should be able to view or edit it?
  • What reports or dashboards must be available at launch?
Phase 1

Stabilize intake

Define required fields, document rules, statuses, and initial workflow record.

Phase 2

Automate routing

Route complete requests to reviewers and notify users when action is needed.

Phase 3

Improve visibility

Add dashboards, SLA views, blocked work queues, and leadership reporting.

Phase 4

Optimize

Measure cycle time, bottlenecks, rework, and future enhancement candidates.

Word Brief

Client-ready Workflow Discovery Brief with polished formatting and right-sized branding.

PDF-ready View

Clean print/export layout for executive review and stakeholder handoff.

Jira CSV

Import-ready Scrum stories, priorities, acceptance criteria, developer notes, and QA notes.

QA/UAT Pack

Functional, negative, edge-case, data validation, and user acceptance testing notes.

Simple enough for any user. Structured enough for any delivery team.

The page flow avoids clutter: users can understand the product, see an example, sign in, create a project, analyze intake, and export artifacts.

Clear first action

The main CTA sends users directly to workflow analysis. No confusing dashboard maze.

Plain-language intake

Business users can describe the process naturally while IT teams still receive structured delivery outputs.

Review before use

Every generated artifact is a draft for human validation, stakeholder review, refinement, and approval.

Best-fit use cases

Focused on workflow discovery, requirements readiness, and implementation handoff.

IT delivery intake

Turn stakeholder notes into requirements, stories, criteria, QA notes, risks, and questions before refinement.

Automation discovery

Find manual steps, bottlenecks, duplicate work, and simple automation opportunities.

Consultant deliverables

Create polished workflow discovery briefs and implementation packs for client review.

Pricing built for discovery work that can grow with you

Start with a single workflow report, then grow into repeatable consultant, IT delivery, or GovCon team usage.

Starter Report

Starter Report

$99 one-time

For a single workflow analysis and quick delivery summary.

  • 1 workflow analysis from pasted intake or uploaded file
  • Basic automation assessment with priority and value notes
  • Requirements summary for early scoping
  • Exportable brief in Word-compatible document and PDF-ready format
  • Copy-ready summary for stakeholder review
Solo Consultant

Consultant Pro

$79 /month

For independent consultants creating repeatable delivery packs.

  • Saved project library and reusable analyses
  • Repeat workflow assessments for multiple clients
  • Branded Word/PDF exports and clean client-ready handoffs
  • Jira-ready story output for implementation teams
  • Reusable discovery structure for faster client intake
Team Workspace

Team

$299 /month

For small IT delivery teams that need a shared workflow discovery motion.

  • Team workspace with multiple workflow analyses
  • Shared templates for intake, requirements, testing, and exports
  • Multiple project support across clients or internal teams
  • Priority support for rollout and adoption
  • Export history for Word-compatible briefs, PDF-ready files, and CSV story packs
GovCon / Enterprise

GovCon Ready

Custom

For contractors, enterprise groups, and security-conscious delivery organizations.

  • Security documentation support and controlled deployment options
  • Private workspace paths and audit-oriented operating model
  • Contractor templates for workflow discovery and delivery artifacts
  • Custom onboarding for team-specific needs
  • Governed export package for Word-compatible briefs, PDF-ready deliverables, and Jira-ready CSV output

Ready to turn messy processes into build-ready systems?

Start with a demo workspace and generate your first workflow discovery package.

WorkflowHarvest

Sign in

Continue to your workspace.

No account?

Welcome back Upload intake, analyze workflow, review opportunities, generate requirements, and export.

Dashboard

Simple readiness snapshot for the latest workflow analysis.

0%Workflow Readiness Score
0%Automation Opportunity Score
0%Requirements Completeness Score
0Estimated Hours Saved
0Open Gaps
Current process gaps

What is slowing the workflow?

  • Run an analysis to identify unclear handoffs, missing data, and manual steps.
Automation recommendations

What should be automated first?

  • Run an analysis to prioritize quick wins and phased automation opportunities.

Recent workflow analyses

Saved analyses appear here after you click Analyze Workflow.

Secondary details +

This area is intentionally collapsed so first-time users focus on the core path: Intake → Automation Opportunities → Requirements → Export.

New Workflow Analysis

Use one simple intake workspace. Upload files and paste notes together, then review the unified analysis input before generating outputs.

Files and pasted text work together. Uploads inject extracted context into the project intake details, and the project name carries through every executive export.

File Upload

Upload supporting process files. Extracted text will be added into the same editable project intake area below. Supports PDF, DOCX, CSV, XLSX / Excel, TXT, Markdown, PNG, JPG, JPEG, and WEBP.

Upload a process file or drag it here.

Extracted text is added to the project intake details. Images require OCR integration.
Uploading file
Uploading fileReading documentExtracting textPreparing analysis inputReady to analyze

Project Name

Name the project, review extracted file text, add missing context, then analyze the workflow.

Used as the official project title on every export, report cover, table of contents, and filename.

Automation Opportunities

Find the steps that can be simplified, automated, routed, validated, or removed.

Current process gaps

Gaps identified from the intake

  • Run an analysis to populate process gaps.
Recommended automation path

What to automate first

  • Run an analysis to populate automation recommendations.

Quick Wins

Requirements

Grouped by delivery category and traceable to the intake.

Export

Download polished, executive-ready Word-compatible documents with compact WorkflowHarvest branding, clean page structure, controlled logo sizing, and verification language built in.

Client-ready exports

Every export is designed to look like a client-facing executive brief, not a raw AI dump.

WorkflowHarvest outputs are generated from user-provided information and should be reviewed, validated, and approved by the user before business, technical, legal, compliance, security, financial, or operational reliance.

Library

Saved workflow analyses from this browser. Project names are used as official report titles on exports.

Settings

Demo account and workspace preferences stored in localStorage.